“…but the wise shall
understand.” (Daniel 12: 10)
Theology presents a problem for placement, wherever there is a
choice between Religion and Philosophy. I cannot easily divide it
into dogmatic theology, which belongs to Religion, and speculative theology, which belongs to
philosophy, because the line is not all that clearly drawn. It is only obvious
when we are looking at homiletic theology versus religion criticism, but such a
distinction between the extremes gives us nothing toward the distinction of the
basics.
A
theoretical way to make this distinction would be to say that whenever we
consider theology from inside its religion, we are dealing with religion, but
whenever we do it from the outside, it is philosophy. Yet, this does not work
either. A Christian philosopher studying Christian theology as “philosophy” is
disingenuous of necessity, as he is patently incapable of making such a separation,
removing him entirely from his own religion.
Besides,
there is a similar problem in trying to place philosophy of religion,
for instance, in either of these sections. Encyclopaedia Britannica “solves”
this problem of placement by placing it in both, which is only proving, with
reference to my case, that tautology and confusion here are unavoidable.
There
is no sense for me either, to try to draw a sharp line of distinction where
there is no borderline, but a diffused and ambiguous overlap over a common, but
little-disputed territory. My placement decisions then (Philosophy or Religion?!)
are to be guided by instinct, rather than by definition. Yet, this is by no
means a loss for formal, “rational” study, as long as we shift that study’s
focus from a search for some objectivity
to a bemused retrospection, going case by case to determine where exactly our
theological bus swerves off the road of religion to the adjacent road of
philosophy and back, and how the bus driver reacts to such swerves.
To
generalize this somewhat, one can learn a lot about a country, its general
philosophical direction, and its future, by studying its prominent figures
speaking or writing on matters specifically involving theology and ethics. It
is great fun to watch brainwashers getting brainwashed themselves in the
process of brainwashing others, as only through such instances can we discern
with the greatest ease what the brainwashing is really about, and where it is
leading both the leaders and the followers…
A
fascinating subject of study, a bonanza for political psychologists!
No comments:
Post a Comment