The
concept of angel is incredibly
intriguing from the philosophical standpoint, yet here it is in the Sonnets section, as a compromise of
sorts, as I do not wish to argue about the angels’ theological value, and placing
this entry in the Philosophy section
could be easily misconstrued that way. Angels have an aesthetic value, and
their role in literature and art cannot be overstated, and they particularly
pose an ethical conundrum, as to their essential affinity to man, in so far as
their division into the good, the bad,
and the ugly is concerned. This last point is surprisingly not so obvious
to all, as angelic goodness is
traditionally taken for granted, in spite of, say, the angelic badness of Lucifer.
The
present entry mentions literary angelic personages, such as Milton’s Abdiel,
etc., and serves as the first part of a diptych that includes Lermontov’s Demon as the second part. All the more
the reason to place it in the Sonnets
section…
What
is an angel? Let us start with
several relevant definitions in my Webster’s
Dictionary:
1.
Literally,
a messenger. [Rare.]
2.
A
spirit, or a spiritual being, employed by God, according to the Scriptures, to
communicate His will to man.
3.
A
ministering or guiding spirit.
4.
A
conventional image of a white-robed figure in human form with wings and a halo.
5.
A
minister of the Gospel, or pastor; as the angel of the church at Ephesus.
6.
A
person regarded as beautiful, good, innocent, etc.
The
tendency to associate angels with goodness and beauty has permeated theological
and secular literature and examples of such exclusively positive associations
are enormously abundant. In order not to confuse an angelic angel with an angel
of hell, the word demon has been used
by the Church Fathers, like in Tertullian: “Every angel and demon is winged.
Consequently, they are everywhere in one moment. To them, the whole world is
one place.”
Or
here, in strictly positive sense, in John Calvin’s 1536 Institutes of the Christian Religion, I: “The angels are the dispensers and
administrators of the Divine beneficence toward us; they regard our safety,
undertake our defense, direct our
ways, and exercise constant solicitude that no evil befall us.”
Now,
here is Martin Luther’s ‘definitive’ view of what an angel really is (Tischreden, DLXIX): “An angel is a
spiritual creature created by God without a body, for the service of
Christendom and of the Church.”
Let
us however refer to the authority of the holy Bible, where we find the
following “exception” to the apparent “rule” of angelic goodness: “…God spared not
the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into
chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment.” (II Peter 2:4)
And
then, of course, we have Lucifer,
perhaps the greatest of God’s angels in Heaven, and look what happened to him,
according to the Fourteenth Chapter of Isaiah:
“How art
though fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art though cut
down to the ground…” (Isaiah
14:12, etc.)
Apparently,
the angels are not indiscriminately angelic creatures, but, like man, they are
endowed by their Creator with the same freedom of choice that happened to be
both the bane and the boon of Adam. With this understanding in mind, therefore,
we must always approach this intriguing subject, while realizing that what we
know about the angels is pitifully inadequate. For instance, how can we trust
an angel capable of a Satanic betrayal due to his possession of this terrible
quality, which is his freedom of choice, that has been responsible for turning
the best of angels into an enemy of God.
Lucifer
was obviously not alone in his “rebellion” against God. (By the way, can we by
the same token call Adam’s and Eve’s act of disobedience of God in Genesis Chapter III equally a “rebellion?” After all, God Almighty does
not face a stronger enemy in Satan than he does in Adam. It was up to Him to
punish Satan right away or to empower him to become the Prince of the world
which God had created with Satan’s help, and called it “good”!)
No comments:
Post a Comment