(Also see my Ronald Reagan entry
Tear Down That Curtain, plus the Losing Russia entry, both posted on my
blog on January 18th, 2011, as part of the mega-entry Assassination Of An American Dream.)
Mr. Clinton has been
acknowledged as one of the smartest politicians in American history, and
despite being a liar, a promiscuous and irresponsible man, rightly impeached, yet
gutlessly acquitted by the US Senate, he has managed to hold on to a huge
popular following in the United States, and in many other ‘free’ countries
of the world, while his historical presidential rankings range from the
partisan high of #7 (!) to the low of #23, which is of course an exceptionally
high “low.”
To be honest, I would
probably have been more lenient toward him, despite his notorious moral failings
and his unscrupulous submission of the American Presidency to special interests
and the highest bidders, had his foreign policy provided some sort of counterbalance.
But it is precisely on account of his foreign policy, and especially with regard
to his Russian policy, that he is liable
the most to an unequivocal condemnation. The USSR had been a mighty adversary
to the United States, and the military might of post-Soviet Russia had not dissipated
all of a sudden, with those same thousands of nuclear weapons still posing a
threat to America’s national security; and besides it was a show of exceptionally
bad sportsmanship to denigrate the fallen giant, who, as we know, had not
really ceased to exist, as Mr. Clinton had let his country to believe. The American
nation may not have suffered from itright away, but in the long term, his
treatment of Russia hurt American interest more than any other action or policy
of an American President in the history of this nation.
Yes, his reaction to the
dissolution of the Soviet Union had been a delay-action calamity, while on the
surface, both in his foreign policy and in domestic affairs he was hugely successful,
even though in the former he happened to light up the fuse to a bomb that would
explode long after he had left his office, and thus, even in this, he and his supporters
could blame his own malfeasance on the future presidents of the United States.
In matters of the economy, he
was riding an exceptional lucky streak, which had much more to do with the
so-called dot-com bubble and the overall stock market speculative bubble
(Dow Jones reaching 11,908.50, on January 14, 2000, and Nasdaq shooting
up into the stratosphere, with 5,408.62 pts. on March 10, 2000, only to suffer
a subsequent sharp drop, especially with Nasdaq, staying at about 50% or lower
of its Clinton peak pseudo-value up to this day.
Yes, it was Mr. Clinton’s
devilish luck, especially with the USSR having just collapsed, and chickens not
yet coming home to roost at the end of the deceptively prosperous eight years
of his presidency.
There is a pretty obvious
reason why Mr. Clinton is still being given a hero’s treatment, and his
presidency is still remembered with a great nostalgia. Since he left the office in
2001, on a continuing streak of good luck, the country has been going down,
politically, economically, financially, and militarily, both under President
Bush-43, and under his successor, the incumbent President Barack Obama. Thus,
even in this, Mr. Clinton’s fortune has lasted for more than a decade after his tenure, and will
probably keep lasting, until one day America wakes up and realizes that
something unwholesome had been done to her some time ago. Only then, as she
goes back in time to trace the path of her misery to its source, may she
eventually wizen up to the role Mr. Clinton had played in this, and identify
him as one of her rapists.
No comments:
Post a Comment