(The
following are two entries on the ancient physician and philosopher Alcmaeon of
Croton.)
He is very little known, and some students of
pre-Socratic thought find it possible to ignore him completely, as anybody now
asking "Alcmaeon who?!," very well knows. But, as for me, not only am I
refusing to ignore him in this section, but I am giving him two whole entries,
which immediately elevates him to the status of a major pre-Socratic figure. Am
I right in doing this? I am sure that I am.
Webster’s
Biographical Dictionary describes him
as a “Greek physician and Pythagorean philosopher.” He is also said to
have been a direct pupil of Pythagoras, which is chronologically sustainable,
but still this fact has not been established to anybody’s reasonable
satisfaction. As a sort of agreeable compromise, we have included him in this
section’s sequence of entries right after Pythagoras, but we are going to
discuss him on his own merit, giving him two entries here. This one will
consider him as a physician and medical scientist; the second one will look at
him as a philosopher.
Alcmaeon’s
incredible achievement as a physician must be put in the context of the
chronological timeline. The commonly acknowledged “father of modern medicine”
Hippocrates lived a full century after him. It is argued that all Hippocratic
medicine including his teaching about the four types of temperament, was based
on Alcmaeon’s ideas. It is very unfortunate that Alcmaeon has been so
underrated and virtually unknown in modern historiography of medicine and
philosophy of science. For this reason alone, we must take note of him here,
and for this reason we are giving him more than one entry, thus treating him as
a major figure of PreSocratica. Perhaps, his greatest medical,
scientific, and philosophical achievement has been placing the source of human
cognition in the brain, rather than in the heart, as was the common conception
of his time. His other great achievement in this vein was to recognize certain
mental similarities between humans and animals, the capacity of both to experience
emotions, sensations, and perceptions. In other words, just like the humans,
the animals possessed a soul.
It
was, however, one thing for an animal to have a soul, but quite a different
thing to proceed with equating its psychical organization with that of a human
being. Man differs from the animal by virtue of his intellect and reasoning
capacity. Anatomically, this boils down to major differences in the size and structure
of the brain, and of the sensory organs. Now, although the intellect is what
sets man apart from the animals, the intellect itself is rooted in perceptions,
originating in the sensory organs. Alcmaeon sees perceptions as the starting
point of all cognition, and attempts to describe the conditions under which
perceptions arise, which require an adequate amount of homogeneity between the
sensory organs and their stimulants. (Although in this first entry we are looking
at Alcmaeon the physician, see how seamlessly anatomy/medicine turns
into epistemology/philosophy here. In fact, I have deliberately allowed this
anatomical discussion to turn into a philosophical discussion, in order to make
this particular point.)
Returning
to medical subjects, Alcmaeon was making a connection between different types
of vital activity and blood circulation. A partial reflux of blood from the
veins in the brain causes sleep, while the return of blood causes awakening and
a full reflux causes death. The overall state of health depends on four
elements which are water, earth, air, and fire: the building blocks of the
body. An equilibrium and harmony of the four determines the physical health of
the body and the soundness of the mind. Their imbalances cause diseases and
ultimately death. Their balance depends on the type of food the person eats, on
geography, climate, and the environment, as well as on the peculiarities of the
individual organism. (How modern sounding!!!)
And
finally, to close this entry, the following much abridged excerpt from the Alcmaeon
entry in Wikipedia gives a competent and succinct overview of the
rest of his accomplishments as the pre-Hippocratic genius of ancient medicine:
He was considered an early pioneer and advocate of anatomical
dissection, the first to identify Eustachian tubes. His great discoveries in
the field of dissection were noted in antiquity, but whether his knowledge in
this branch of science was derived from the dissection of animals or of human
bodies is still disputed.
He also was the first to dwell on the internal causes of illnesses.
He first suggested that health was a state of equilibrium between opposing
humors, and that illnesses occurred because of problems in the environment,
nutrition and lifestyle. He also experimented with live animals by cutting the
nerve behind the eye, to study vision.
Our
discussion of Alcmaeon continues in the next entry.
No comments:
Post a Comment