While
the glory of Nineveh is inextricably tied to the name of Ashurbanipal (it must
also be clear from the previous entry that the whole glorious history of
ancient Mesopotamia owes him a large debt of gratitude, on account of his
library), the glory of the city of Babylon proper goes hand-in-hand with the
name of Nebuchadnezzar II. This last great king of Mesopotamia, before Babylon
fell, first to the Persians, and then, to Alexander and the Greeks, owes his
fame to two sets of circumstances. His fateful role in the history of the Jews
has one curious dimension, which I am particularly eager to discuss in this
entry. On the other hand, his role in the history of Babylon and Mesopotamia
proper, is a gem in its own right, and, considering the fact that this is also
the final entry in my Mesopotamian series, it is the latter aspect of his
significance that I have focused on in its title.
Nebuchadnezzar
II (ruled from 605 to 562 BC), considered the ablest Babylonian ruler since
Hammurapi, inherited the neo-Babylonian Empire from his Chaldaean father
Nabopalassar (meaning “son of nobody,” or, as we call them today, “a self-made man”), who had rebelled
against Assyria in 626 BC, conquered and destroyed Nineveh, and founded the
aforesaid Empire. An able warrior since an early age, Nebuchadnezzar, while
still a young prince, defeated the army of Egypt, and secured the control of
Syria for his father. Crowned as king, on his father’s death, he felt secure
enough at home to continue his relentless campaigns abroad, culminating in the
historical conquest of Judah, several sieges of Jerusalem (it took some twenty
years to reduce the city to dust,--- not for his inability to do it sooner, but
due to his initial reluctance to go beyond exacting tribute from Judah, which
was not coming, as Judah defected from him again and again, tying her fortunes
to a succession of losers), the destruction of the First Temple, and the deportation
of the Jews into captivity. Meanwhile, the fate of Jerusalem, in the wake of
his outrage, was to become for more than a century what Isaiah had
promised as the land of briers and thorns.
Despite
his terrible role in Jewish history, Nebuchadnezzar is viewed by the Jewish
tradition in a generally favorable light. He was the protector of the Prophet
Jeremiah, much kinder to him than the Jewish kings of Judah were to their
own, and he also became a friend to the Prophet Daniel, seeking his
advice and acting upon it. Jeremiah was quite tolerant of him, seeing him not
as a bloody aggressor and tyrant, but as God’s own instrument, whom it was a
sin to disobey. A similar attitude is expressed by the Prophet Ezekiel.
In the Book of Daniel, and in Bel and the Dragon, Nebuchadnezzar
comes out as a champion of Truth, welcoming God’s vindication. (In a way, one
may draw a parallel here between the attitude of the Bible’s Jews toward
Nebuchadnezzar, and a similarly favorable attitude of the Hasidic Jews, not
long ago invited to a Holocaust Conference in Teheran, to their host President
Ahmadinejad. Even more ironic in this “Iranian” respect, it was the Persian
King Cyrus who would end the Babylonian Captivity of the Jews and would allow
them to return home after his own conquest of Babylonia, just a few years after
Nebuchadnezzar’s death. Incidentally, how
does a certain Evangelical pastor from Texas, named John Hagee, fit into this
picture?...)
This
astonishingly positive attitude toward one of their worst oppressors in
history, on the part of the Jews, is already enough to mark Nebuchadnezzar as
one of the most interesting personalities in world history. But as I have
suggested, there is another aspect of his story, which I am now eager to point
to.
Inasmuch
as Ashurbanipal was the great benefactor of Nineveh, Nebuchadnezzar was the
great rebuilder of Babylon, giving it all the splendor of the world’s foremost
capital. The rebuilding effort, lasting throughout Nebuchadnezzar’s long reign,
was so extensive that it is practically impossible for modern archaeologists to
find any traces of structures at its site predating his time. Herodotus’ florid
descriptions of Babylon are, of course, all a testimony to Nebuchadnezzar’s
architectural genius.
His
Babylon was by far the largest city in the world, surrounded by a 60-mile-long
wall, which was often counted as an “alternate member” among the seven wonders
of the ancient world. The wall itself was 300 feet high, 80 feet thick, going
down 35 feet below the ground, so that the enemy could not tunnel his way under
it. The city had fifty-three temples and 180 altars to Ishtar. The Great Temple
of Marduk (Bel) was known as one of the world’s greatest sanctuaries ever. Its
golden image of Bel plus a massive golden table weighed a good 50,000 pounds.
In the prophetic words of Isaiah, Babylon was truly a city of gold.
Associated
with the Temple was a ziggurat, popularly known as the Tower of Babel,
with seven stages, the base one hundred yards on each side, all reaching a
height of 300 feet. Although Nebuchadnezzar’s famed hanging gardens (allegedly
built to please his Median Queen Amuhia, but commonly associated with the name
of the mythical Assyrian Queen Semiramis) did not survive the fuga
temporum, they are universally counted as one of the seven wonders of the
ancient world, second after the Egyptian Pyramids.
Nebuchadnezzar’s
Palace in Babylon was yet another magnificent structure, whose vast ruins were
dug up by the archaeologists a hundred years ago. Unlike the beautiful Nineveh,
completely destroyed in 612 BC, the city of Babylon was spared by the Persian
King Cyrus, and long remained one of the greatest cities of the world as the
capital of Persia’s richest satrapy. Alexander the Great had ambitious plans
for Babylon’s major restoration, but, cut short by his death, they remained
unfulfilled, and the city eventually declined in the next few centuries. As the
new capital Baghdad of the Abbasid Caliphate was ordered to be built, since 762
AD, the builders, with complete disregard for the Babylonian history, used
Babylon’s hallowed bricks to build Baghdad and repair the canals, reducing
Nebuchadnezzar’s last glory to a desolate heap of mounds, as if in fulfillment
of the Biblical prophecy of Isaiah 13:17-22 and Jeremiah 51:37-43.
So
much for modern Iraqis and their Arab ancestors, claiming ownership of the
Babylonian glory. The fact that the memory of Babylon survives in the history
of human civilization owes no thanks to those who used its ancient structures
for bricks, and back in 762 AD discarded Babylon’s antiquity in favor of a
brand-new construction called Baghdad. As for the historical legacy of
Nebuchadnezzar himself, aside from his unique place in the Bible, his monument
as the architect of the fairytale city of Babylon is aere perennius, built
not so much out of brick and gold, as out of the hylos of the historical
memory of the human race.
No comments:
Post a Comment