The
sweetest angel who ever walked the earth is not worth much in the memory of
posterity, unless he had left behind him a permanent token of his greatness, aere
perennius, to be remembered and admired by. An abject scoundrel, on the other
hand, who may have been the bane of his contemporaries yet who survives in his
great work for eternity, will be judged not by his personal failings, but by
his transpersonal contribution to human civilization, which alone can mark any
person as a bona fide genius.
Of
the three builders of wonder, which are the Great Pyramids of Giza and
the Sphinx, the Pharaohs of the Fourth Dynasty Cheops (Khufu), Chephren
(Khafre) and Menkaure (Mykerinos) are appropriately credited. The historically
greatest two were apparently despicable despots who mercilessly exploited their
people for the personal gratification of their vanity. In the sober words of
Herodotus, “Cheops became king over them, and he
brought them every kind of evil: he shut up all the temples and ordered all the
Egyptians to work for him. (It would take them ten long years just to
amass the stones and other building material at the selected site of the future
Pyramid.) The making of the Pyramid itself took twenty
years. Cheops, moreover, came to such wickedness that being in want of money,
he caused his own daughter to sit before a house [as a prostitute]. (The
woman obeyed her father with a vengeance, not only fulfilling Cheops’s
financial requirements by fleecing her clients, but then managing to scrape
together a sum of money large enough to build her own mini-Pyramid. This
unpleasant story may well be a nefarious fable, but it still makes the larger
point with a brilliantly wicked elegance.)
“Cheops reigned fifty years, and after he was dead his brother
Chephren succeeded him. This king behaved like his brother, in all the rest,
and also he made a Pyramid. He reigned for fifty-six years. (Chephren’s own Pyramid, although the second largest
in Giza, is inferior to his brother’s colossal masterpiece. Even though he
reigned longer than Cheops, the resources of his nation must already have been
somewhat depleted, for him to be able either to raise or at least to match his
brother’s tomb. But he did not have to! Aside from the fact that the Pyramid
complex at Giza is rendered even more stunning by their assymetricity, Chephren
had achieved a clear personal uniqueness in the catalogue of the world’s
cultural treasures by the creation of the Great Sphinx of Giza, which is
chronologically attributed to his reign.) Here then
they reckon one hundred and six years, during which there was nothing but evil
for the Egyptians, and the temples were kept closed during that time.”
It
is fairly obvious that the superhuman effort required by their construction
taxed every available national resource in blood and treasure, leaving nothing
for the priests and their temples, which is why the latter had to be closed. It
is amazing however how inferior was the power of the priests, compared to the
royal power, so that no revolt during those hundred-plus years was either possible,
or else, capable of success.
The
third among the Builders of Wonder (this title phrase of the entry is of
my invention) was Mykerinos, the son of Cheops, and now the incredible irony
begins, again courtesy of Herodotus: “After him, they
said, Mykerinos (Menkaure) became king over Egypt, who was the son of Cheops;
and to him his father’s deeds were displeasing. And he opened the temples and
gave liberty to the people to return to their own business and to their
sacrifices. He also decided their causes more justly than the other kings. In
regard to this, then, they commend this king beyond the other kings in Egypt
before him; for, he not only gave good decisions, but also, when a man complained
of the decision, he gave him recompense from his own goods (…All ways
are my ways, says the Queen in Alice. On the one hand, being
the third extravagant builder, even on a much smaller scale, “his own goods”
simply had to be public goods, on the other hand, the story sounds too good to
be true, and may have been based on a single episode, subjected to some
rigorous spin) and thus satisfied him. (Here
now comes the incredible irony I mentioned before!) But,
while Mykerinos was acting mercifully to his subjects, and practicing this good
conduct, calamities befell him. His daughter died, the only child he had in his
house. Grieved beyond measure he made a cow of wood covered with gold and in it
he buried his daughter. (Herodotus does not stop here, however:) Some, however, tell the following tale. Mykerinos was
enamored of his own daughter, and raped her; the girl hanged herself, and he
buried her in this cow.”
So
how does this make him better than his two predecessors? Ergo,
let us stay with what we know as a fact, which is the creation by these three
of the world’s perennial the once and current wonder, and let us admire
this great wonder for its own sake, as I admired it on my 1970 trip to Egypt,
which would remain one of the defining moments of my life. As for the fables of
history, let them be there as well, both highly entertaining and edifying, but
no more personal now, many years after the fact, than the magnificent
royal mummies of Egypt, whom we can admire as mummies, that is as relics of our
ancient past, rather than quod mortalis fint (that is, whosoever and
whatsoever they happened to be once very long ago in their far-removed
mortality).
No comments:
Post a Comment