Sunday, June 15, 2014

THE CLEVEREST FORGER FROM AUTHORITY


[Dionysius the Areopagite was an Athenian of the first century, converted by St. Paul (Acts 17:34), who is known to all Christendom as St. Denis. There is also an unknown author, of circa 500 AD, who used to be for centuries identified as the said saint, whose works The Celestial Hierarchy, Mystical Theology, Divine Names, and others, had an immense influence on medieval thought (St Thomas Aquinas cited “Dionysius more than 1700 times!), no doubt because of such authoritative cover of the brilliant impostor, who might, otherwise, have been quickly accused of heresy, and summarily dismissed... Sic venit gloria ecclesiastica! Today the clever forger has been exposed as one, but his identity still remains unknown, as he has received the “negative” of name of Pseudo-Dionysius in the annals of history and philosophy.]

“So Paul departed from among them. Howbeit certain men clave unto him, and believed: among which was Dionysius the Areopagite, and a woman named Damaris, and others with them. (Acts 17:33-34.)

What better authority could a sixth-century thinker assume for his writings in the midst of the dark ages of philosophy than the authority of an obscure Pauline convert, mentioned by name in the Holy Scriptures? A better-known cover name would have been too easy to expose at the time, but the obscurity of Dionysius in the Bible complicated the exposure and given his impeccable credentials as a bona fide follower of Apostle Paul, the author could and did get away with much of what would otherwise have been sternly disallowed. And so he did.

Pseudo-Dionysius was an unmistakable Neo-Platonist, writing in Greek. His work The Mystical Theology imitates the familiar form of the pre-Socratics, but tries to reconcile the essence of Greek philosophy with the outward teachings of Christianity, in the sense that he is eager to adapt Christianity to Neo-Platonism, rather than the other way around. Here is the opening paragraph of his Mystical Theology:

Supernal Triad (notice how he addresses the Trinity in unmistakably Pythagorean, mystical terms!), Deity above all essence, knowledge and goodness; Guide of Christians to Divine Wisdom; direct our path to the ultimate summit of your mystical knowledge, most incomprehensible, most luminous, and most exalted,--- where the pure, absolute, and immutable mysteries of theology are veiled in the dazzling obscurity of the secret Silence, outshining all brilliance with the intensity of their Darkness, and surcharging our blinded intellects with the utterly impalpable and invisible fairness of glories surpassing all beauties.

There are many subtle heresies in Pseudo-Dionysian teachings, some of them quite overt, such as the idea of a virtually pantheistic Henosis as opposed to the more acceptable doctrine of the Christian Theosis. It is thus almost inconceivable how the unimpeachable authority of a totally obscure, once-mentioned Paul’s Biblical follower was able to so thoroughly confound the otherwise razor-sharp acute theological sensibilities of all those distinguished Christian leaders of the Church, who were either incapable, or, more likely, deliberately reluctant to expose the glaring heresy of one of their most revered original saints, which, had they done so, would probably have exposed not the Saint himself, but the brilliant fraud hiding behind his name.

The Pseudo-Dionysian teachings were particularly popularized throughout the Catholic Christian Church in the ninth century, being translated from the original Greek by a certain John Scotus Erigena who must have taken the greatest pleasure from that translation, finding the author’s views so close to his heart. Now is the right time to introduce the great Irishman in our very next entry.

No comments:

Post a Comment